During the writing test, I came across one more question: I sort of like testing a WEP-300, but how can one explain the fact that the company already had a headset? Moreover, it is sort of like in some markets. I must say that "my» WEP-300 is quite different, not only if the company will hold the correct pricing, you can get a very strong "Pulse" product. But first things first.
Design and construction
I deliberately did not talk about price, let's look at the headset apart from this indicator. So, we have the headset plug-type bow is not here, either removable or embedded. Podium dynamics reminiscent of WEP-410, and a general impression about the design immediately connected with the 410th, like 'three hundredth' slightly reduced in length, repainted and added a traditional way to charge. Progress is not bad, the consumer gets used to a similar design, especially as the design itself is good, there's nothing to say. The front part is made of silver plastic, coating gloss, not matte, most likely, wipe during use will not be. All the lower part is black, I like running with surround volume control buttons, made it interesting, and the perception of influence, like the added security. Attachment to the speaker is made in the corporate style, is something like a mushroom cap with holes, nothing prevents you put the nozzle on the HPM-70 or any other headset. The assembly is very dense, without any gaps, which are all very cool. Essentially speaking, the carp simply do not need it.
The headset is not very noticeable on the ear, does not attract attention, under the headline almost unnoticeable.
Wearing
As you know, you can wear the headset in either ear without the slightest inconvenience. The only problem may be due to the fact that the nozzle does not crawl through, but this is rare. For example, while using it seemed to me that the 300th is not very well sit in the left ear, trying to fall in the right ear, wear it seemed safer. Sports and active movements, I can not recommend it - can still fall in all other situations, recommend, and convenient, and easy to wear.
Management
In this "baby" has four buttons to operate, it keys on the ends, multi-function button is very small Reset button next to the microphone, designed for memory release of excess cargo.Everything is intuitive, the volume is the limiter - the sound signal when peak. Keystrokes clear, with a click.
Food
The headset is equipped with built-in lithium-ion polymer battery capacity 100 mAh, claimed battery life is around 5 hours of standby time - about 80 hours charging time - two hours. Little garniturka, a small battery, as a consequence - a little time. However, a little-it is small, but a couple of days is not particularly vigorous activity (say, 1.5 hours of calls per day) with shutting down for the night would be enough, for this option, I would not cavil. Connector for charging the firm, fine, if a WEP-410 charging system applied across chest, everything is usually a hole located at the end, it is open to all winds. Well, how can there be a cap at such a microscopic size? I think if you do not wear a Thing in the same pocket where the cigarettes are wearing (left crumbs of tobacco), then no problem.
Communication with the phone and sound quality
I tested the headset with the phone Samsung G800, to enter pairing mode, press and hold the multifunction key for a few seconds (headset initially be turned off). Standard code is 0000. What can I say? Quality as a quality, nothing special. True, nearly all sides said that they hear me as if at a distance, sometimes complained of the otherworldly noise, but it was much less than normal conversation. In the speaker passed the melody, installed on the phone, the volume lacks the voice of the interlocutor, though not particularly "clean" and not always natural. Works correctly dial the last number (one click), the activation of second-line, voice dialing (press and hold for a couple of seconds). The device uses profile Bluetooth 2.0, the connection is reliable, the approximate range of 4-5 meters. In short, everything here is more or less normal for the product in its class. And now for the class.
Conclusions
What do you think how much the products? To some foreign websites, the figure is little more than twenty euros, that is something like seven hundred rubles. For a product that has:
Good, "the road" design
A convenient way to wear
Acceptable voice quality
... This is more than an adequate price. Not only is adequate, yet tasty. I would highly recommend people in charge of the company's pricing, make the price even lower than a thousand rubles, then the result would be a very "tasty" instance, designed for impulse purchases. I have often observed in recent years, both in the mobile phone stores, men and women wander in search of something very inexpensive for use in the car, you know, what it is connected.The choice they have is small - are products from Jabra (BT-125, 135), Nokia BH100/200/300, SonyEricsson PV700/702, Plantronics 220, outdated headsets Motorola. Against this background, the proposal from Samsung to be a genius, competition in this niche he could reach only the SE PV702 (longer works, sound quality is better), but the latest and more expensive. If the price of retail, the company will retain a level of 700-900 rubles, then a WEP-300 just will not be competitors. I recommend the device to buy, not just those who are limited in budget, but also drivers who are exhausted Narzanov (that is the law). In selling the device will appear before the Christmas holidays, the company should hurry, while great excitement.
